Wednesday, June 20, 2012
In an attempt to attack Republicans who have voted to hold Eric Holder in contempt of congress, Nancy Pelosi stated that she could have arrested Karl Rove on any given day. This, of course, means that while she was in a position of oversight, Pelosi must have allowed for corruption of some sort to simply continue unhindered. It seems doubtful as to whether anyone will question her about what she knew and when she knew it, or ask if she was complicit in the illegal activities, or whether she in any way profited from her crimes. But regardless, when the former speaker of the house makes an abject admission of guilt, it's worth taking notice.
Saturday, June 16, 2012
As I was driving today, I found that due to some recent work done on my car I all my radio presets had been lost. So as I was going through the stations, I came across focus on the family. I haven't spent too much time paying attention to main line christian culture in a while, so as today is the day before fathers day I wanted to see if it was as bad as I keep hearing in the manoshpere. And honestly it wasn't horrible. A year ago, I probably wouldn't have even noticed anything wrong with it. But thanks to such bloggers as Dalrock, and Christian Men's Defense Network I was keenly tuned in and waiting for them to engage in some man bashing or undermining of the wives submit to your husbands teaching.
The started out by bringing on a pastor who works with couples.
And he began with saying that a man is the head of the household.
So far so good.
Then that men need to submit themselves to God, and go to Him for direction first in their lives rather than as a last resort.
Then that when a wife sees her husband submit to God she will submit to him because it means that she will be submitting to God.
Uhhhh, a little ignorant on the nature of women and what's in the Bible, but go on.
Then that women will naturally not submit to a man who does not put God first the way that she puts God first.
Ok, you're off in the deep end now.
The second point that they made, that was just pure fiction, was that a man who is a material success, but is not a success at home, is a failure. The point being that your family has to come first and that men should not worship money and all that. They then went on to say that a man's family is a refection of him. So if you have kids and they are doing drugs and having sex and all that delinquent stuff, then you are a failure as not just a father but as a person and a Christian.
Aside from the message of not worshipping money, literally all of that is directly contradicted in the Bible.
First, I'm pretty sure that the whole concept of wives naturally submitting to their husbands when he acts in a way that she deems acceptable has been covered many times by other bloggers. Hopefully simply putting it in that frame makes it clear. And for all the women out there who are caterwalling “How can I submit to my husband if he is not submitted to God? Then I wouldn't be a godly woman!” submitting to other people who are not perfect, is not the same as sinning. Joseph submitted to Pharaoh, and it was righteous. Daniel submitted to Nebuchadnezzar in all things except those that would violate God's law, as did Shadrack, Meshack, and Abednego. Neither Pharaoh or Nebuchadnezzar even claimed to serve God. But God wanted his servants to serve them. So clearly being perfect is not a requirement for leading and expecting to be followed, even with God's blessing.
For the second part, they flat out made it up. No where in the Bible does it say that if you are a godly man then you will have a godly wife and godly children. It does address the idea of putting your family first though. 1St Corinthians 7:29 “From now on those who have wives should live as if they do not”, Luke14:26 “If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brothers, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple”.
God comes first. And doing whatever you need to do to follow Jesus comes before your family. There is no ambiguity in the Bible on this.
And when we look at godly men in the Bible, if anything there is an inverse correlation on how Godly their children are.
Job was one of the most godly men in the Bible.
Job 1:1 “There was a man in the land of Uz, whose name was Job; and that man was perfect and upright, and one that feared God, and eschewed evil.”
Job's children were contently partying, and as he was afraid of their sin he would make sacrifices for them.
Job 1:5 “And it was so, when the days of their feasting were gone about, that Job sent and sanctified them, and rose up early in the morning, and offered burnt offerings according to the number of them all: for Job said, It may be that my sons have sinned, and cursed God in their hearts. Thus did Job continually.”
King David was a man after God's own heart. David's children committed rape, murder, insest, and rebelled against him nearly overthrowing the kingdom.
And if you look at the line of the kings of Israel, there is a lot of good, bad, good, bad, going on. There are only 4 kings who followed God who's father also followed God. 4 out of 23. Granted, there were only about 9 total kings that followed God (discounting Saul), but still, one can't make the claim that following God as a man means that your kids will as well.
The heart of the problem for people that profess this type of Churchianity (Besides ignorance of the Bible or failure to apply it) is that they view women and children as being completely reactive beings. When it comes to women, gamers actually tend to do this as well. They think that if a woman leaves, starts acting bitchy, cheats, or files for divorce, that it must be because the man was not alpha enough. Substitute alpha for godly, and you have the Churchianity view. But the Bible teaches that both women and Children are sinful beings, possessing their own free will. While it is true that both women and children are more reactive then men, it's not 100%. And sometimes when a woman or child does something wrong, it's simply because their heart is desperately wicked.
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
Monday, June 4, 2012
A while ago I read that the difference between how men and women view morality is this (btw, if you wrote this let me know in the comments and I'll give you your backlink, I just don't remember which blog I read it from): men tend to have a moral system based on a set of rules, and women tend to have a moral system based on relationships and kindness.
A good Christian should keep both of these in mind. They should have a relationship with Jesus, and they should live by a set of rules which I will broadly call theology. The masculine sin would be to live according to theological rules without having any real relationship with God. Although I was not born at the time, from what I know of history, I believe that this was the Church's biggest problem in the 50s and before. That would explain things like the question in Times magazine: Is God dead?
Then through the sixties into our modern times we had a shift. Instead of focusing on theology in the church, we started to focus on relationship. Which is not a bad thing. The two greatest commands according to Jesus are to love the Lord you God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind and to love your neighbor as yourself (Matthew 22:37-39). Not only that but Jesus also says of the two greatest commands that all the law and the prophets hang on these (Matthew 22:40). So, if you are living your life by following all the rules in the Bible: not having sex outside of marriage, not getting divorced, praying, fasting, the whole works, and you don't love the Lord your God, or love your neighbor as yourself; then you have nothing. Your religion is in vain.
The end result of the shift is that, at least in my experience, you have two kinds of churches today. One is basically just community centers that you go to every Sunday, and tend to not really have either relationship or theology. The second is the evangelical type of churches, where you do have relationship, but the theology is something less than rigorous. So instead of having leaders who intensely study the Bible, and draw the most honest conclusions that they can, even if those conclusions make them uncomfortable, you have movements where there is tons of intellectual laziness, and people are guide mostly by what they feel is right and staying true to themselves. And because they do this, they wind up not following the only two commands that they focused on, and in many cases, not living lives substantially different from many new age movements about positive energy or whatever.
Of course neither extreme is good and what you need is both. You DO need to love God and your neighbor. But when it comes to loving God, Jesus tells us: “Whoever has my commands and obeys them, he is the one who loves me”. So the way that we love God is by obeying His commands. And to obey his commands, YOU HAVE TO KNOW WHAT THEY ARE! And to know what they are requires theology.